A £25m Question: Why Is the UK Government Investing in Octopus's 'Powerhouse' Tech Firm?

In a move that has sparked scrutiny from industry analysts, the UK government has taken a minority stake in Kraken Technologies, the software platform developed by energy supplier Octopus. The £25m investment, facilitated by the state-owned British Business Bank, is intended to help the company "scale up and become a UK champion."

This rationale, however, is being met with skepticism. Kraken is not a fledgling startup; it's a global operation managing 70 million customer accounts across four continents and is frequently described as a tech "powerhouse." The core question for many observers is straightforward: why does a successful, scaled business require public subsidy?

Kraken began as Octopus's proprietary customer service platform, handling billing and complaints. Its efficiency led to adoption by other major players like E.ON and National Grid. While Octopus is spinning Kraken out as a separate entity, it will retain a significant shareholding.

Traditionally, government investment targets market failures—either rescuing strategically vital failing firms or funding high-cost, speculative projects with transformative potential, such as nuclear fusion. Kraken appears to fit neither mould. It is already a global entity and, despite reporting a loss in its most recent period after previous profits, successfully raised $1bn in a standalone funding round last December, achieving a valuation of $8.65bn.

This robust investor appetite makes the state's intervention puzzling. Analysts note the government likely bought in at a premium valuation of around 17 times contracted annual revenue, a high multiple that sets a challenging bar for taxpayer returns. Kraken's financials indicate a shift from a high-margin SaaS model to one investing heavily in growth, coinciding with a broader downturn in public market valuations for software firms.

An alternative theory suggests the investment is a strategic nudge to persuade Kraken to list on the London Stock Exchange, which has struggled to attract major tech IPOs, rather than in the US. Business Secretary Peter Kyle told the Financial Times the move was "not a bung" but part of efforts to retain the company in the UK. Yet, with the state securing only about 0.04% of voting rights, its influence over the listing decision appears minimal.

The deal's context also raises questions. The investment follows reports that Octopus Energy faced a potential £1bn shortfall in meeting Ofgem's capital requirements. Shortly after the Kraken sale, the tech firm agreed to guarantee a loan facility for its parent company, Octopus—an unusual "reverse guarantee" that underscores financial interdependencies. Furthermore, Octopus CEO Greg Jackson's roles on government advisory boards, while not implying wrongdoing, create an uncomfortable perception of proximity between a seller and a state investor.

Ultimately, while the government frames this as backing innovation, critics argue the primary market failure being addressed may be Octopus's own regulatory capital position—a problem the Kraken sale itself solves. The deal leaves unanswered whether it delivers genuine value for taxpayers or meaningful strategic benefit for the UK.

What Readers Are Saying

Michael Chen, Tech Analyst in London: "This is a perplexing use of public funds. The market has clearly validated Kraken with a $1bn raise. The state is entering at a late, expensive stage, chasing a listing for London's benefit, not funding genuine market failure."

Sarah Wilkinson, Small Business Owner in Bristol: "As a taxpayer, I'm furious. This is a blatant subsidy for a giant that doesn't need it, while high streets and actual small innovators crumble. It reeks of cronyism and poor fiscal stewardship."

David R. Miller, Pension Fund Manager: "The investment rationale is weak on financial returns. However, if it strategically anchors a key tech platform in the UK ecosystem and encourages further R&D investment here, the long-term indirect benefits might justify the premium."

Priya Sharma, Energy Policy Researcher at Cambridge: "The focus should be on the outcome. If this ensures Kraken's AI-driven grid management tools are developed and deployed primarily for the UK's net-zero transition, there could be a compelling national interest argument, albeit poorly communicated."

Try full access to The Telegraph free today. Unlock their award-winning website and essential news app, plus useful tools and expert guides for your money, health and holidays.