Analysis: Trump Tariffs Add to Consumer Costs, Slowing Inflation's Decline

By Michael Turner | Senior Markets Correspondent

WASHINGTON — Inflation has moderated from its post-pandemic peak, but a new economic analysis concludes that the pace of decline has been undercut by the sweeping import tariffs imposed by the Trump administration over the past year.

The report, from the nonpartisan research organization EconoFact, estimates that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) reading of 2.9% in August 2024 would have been approximately 2.2% had the tariffs not been enacted. This suggests that policies championed as tools for economic revival are simultaneously applying upward pressure on the prices of everyday goods.

Since returning to office, President Trump has invoked rarely-used emergency powers to levy tariffs on imports from a vast array of trading partners, arguing the move is necessary to secure "reciprocal" trade deals and reverse decades of manufacturing decline. The strategy has pushed average U.S. tariff rates to their highest level since the Smoot-Hawley era of the 1930s.

Economists widely agree that tariffs function as a tax, initially paid by importers but ultimately passed on to consumers. The EconoFact analysis aligns with this view, noting that price declines for retail goods—which began in the latter part of the previous administration as pandemic-era supply chain pressures eased—have been partially offset by the tariff-driven increases.

The legal foundation of the policy is now in question. The Supreme Court heard arguments in November on whether the President overstepped his authority in declaring a national economic emergency to justify the tariffs, with a ruling expected imminently.

The political stakes are high. A recent New York Times/Siena College poll found 54% of voters disapprove of the tariff policies, highlighting the tension between the administration's industrial goals and household economic concerns.

Dr. Evelyn Reed, Economic Historian at Carnegie Mellon: "This is a classic case of conflicting policy objectives. The intent to reshore manufacturing is clear, but the immediate effect is a regressive tax on consumption. History shows such trade barriers often deliver short-term pain with uncertain long-term gain."

Marcus Johnson, Small Business Owner in Ohio: "My hardware store's costs on tools and materials are up 18% since spring. I support American manufacturing, but these tariffs are squeezing my margins and my customers before any new factory jobs have materialized here."

Rep. David Chen (R-CA): "The President is finally standing up to decades of unfair trade practices. A slight, temporary adjustment in inflation is a small price to pay for rebuilding our industrial base and national sovereignty. The critics would have us remain dependent on China forever."

Sarah Gibson, Consumer Advocate: "It's infuriating. This report confirms what families see every week at the grocery store and the mall. We're being told the economy is improving while policies actively make basics more expensive. It's a direct hit to working- and middle-class budgets."

Share:

This Post Has 0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Leave a Reply