FCC Chair Signals Green Light for Paramount's $110 Billion Warner Bros Acquisition
In a significant boost for one of the largest media mergers in history, the chair of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission has signaled his agency is unlikely to stand in the way of Paramount's proposed $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. The move downplays immediate regulatory concerns over the combination of major TV networks like CBS and CNN under a single corporate roof.
The path for Paramount, now the sole remaining bidder after Netflix declined to counter its $31-per-share offer, appears clearer following comments from FCC Chair Brendan Carr. Speaking at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Carr acknowledged "concerns raised in Washington about the concentration of power" stemming from Warner Bros' earlier partnership with Netflix. However, he drew a sharp distinction, stating that "the level of market share and issue with a Paramount purchase is drastically different."
Carr, appointed in 2024, clarified that the bulk of the antitrust review will fall to the Department of Justice. The FCC's role will be narrower, focusing primarily on the deal's financial structure. Paramount's bid is backed by $47 billion in equity from the Ellison family—Oracle founder Larry Ellison and his son, Paramount CEO David Ellison—and private equity firm RedBird Capital Partners, alongside Middle Eastern sovereign wealth investors who have agreed to forgo governance rights.
"All the information I've seen about that foreign debt... qualifies under FCC rules as what we call bona fide debt," Carr noted, suggesting a "very quick, almost pro forma review."
The merger would create an entertainment and news behemoth, uniting two legendary Hollywood studios, merging the Paramount+ and HBO Max streaming services, and bringing CNN and CBS News under one umbrella. While some critics warn of excessive influence in news media, Carr described competition in the sector as "very robust" and emphasized the FCC's role is to encourage investment and scale in broadcasting, not to regulate cable channel content.
The deal's political dimensions are unmistakable. President Donald Trump, a longtime critic of CNN, has a vested interest in seeing changes at the network. Columbia Law School professor Reilly Steel pointed to "anticipatory compliance," suggesting the DoJ is likely to align with the President's wishes. "Trump will be the ultimate decider," Steel said, noting that major Republican donor Larry Ellison "has the president's ear."
Regulatory challenges remain, however. California Attorney General Rob Bonta warned the takeover has "not cleared regulatory scrutiny," promising a vigorous state-level review. In Europe, where cinema operators have raised alarms, an intensive antitrust examination is expected. Paramount is already in talks with Brussels regulators; failure to secure approval could trigger a $7 billion break-up fee.
The consolidation of two of Hollywood's five major studios would also grant Paramount significant leverage over industry payments and wages, reshaping the economic landscape of global entertainment.
Reader Reactions:
Michael R., Industry Analyst in Los Angeles: "This isn't just a merger; it's the birth of a media empire. The FCC's stance was predictable, but the real battle will be at the DoJ and in Europe. The vertical integration of content, streaming, and news is unprecedented."
Sarah Chen, Small Theater Owner in Omaha: "I'm terrified. When studios get this big, they squeeze independent theaters on film rentals and dictate terms. This deal could be the final nail in the coffin for many of us already struggling with streaming dominance."
James O'Donnell, Political Commentator in D.C.: "Carr's comments are a disgrace—a rubber stamp for a merger that hands unprecedented news influence to a single CEO with direct ties to the President. This isn't about 'robust competition'; it's about consolidating power and silencing dissent. The independence of CNN is now squarely on the chopping block."
Priya Mehta, Media Investor in London: "From a capital markets perspective, the structure is ingenious. The Ellison-RedBird equity commitment and the passive sovereign wealth funding make it financially robust. The regulatory risk is priced in, and the market seems confident."
Additional reporting by Stefania Palma in Washington.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2023. All rights reserved.