Oman Hosts Critical US-Iran Nuclear Talks Amid Regional Turmoil

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Diplomats from the United States and Iran are set to convene in Muscat, Oman, on Friday for a pivotal round of talks focused on Tehran's nuclear ambitions. The meeting marks a fragile attempt to revive dialogue after a tumultuous period that saw a brief Israel-Iran war in June and a severe government crackdown on domestic protests within the Islamic Republic.

The negotiations, mediated by Omani officials, represent the first direct engagement since last year's discussions in Rome and Muscat were derailed. The shadow of recent violence looms large. President Donald Trump, who initiated this diplomatic track with a personal letter to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei last year, has maintained a dual strategy of pressure and outreach. He has recently suggested military action remains an option, citing Iran's handling of protesters, while simultaneously pushing for a negotiated settlement on the nuclear file.

"I've written them a letter saying, 'I hope you're going to negotiate because if we have to go in militarily, it's going to be a terrible thing,'" Trump acknowledged in a televised interview after dispatching the correspondence in March 2025.

The path to Oman has been fraught. The 12-day conflict in June, which involved U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear infrastructure, reportedly halted all uranium enrichment in the country for a period, according to a later Iranian admission. This was followed by nationwide protests over economic woes, which were met with a lethal response by security forces, further complicating the geopolitical calculus.

Oman, a traditional neutral intermediary in the Gulf, has previously hosted indirect talks between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. Finding common ground remains a monumental challenge. A core point of contention is uranium enrichment: while the 2015 nuclear deal allowed Iran to enrich to 3.67% purity, the U.S. now insists, under Trump, on a policy of zero enrichment—a demand Tehran flatly rejects. Iran currently enriches uranium to 60%, a short technical step from weapons-grade levels, though U.S. intelligence agencies assess it has not yet decided to build a bomb.

The tensions are rooted in a decades-long estrangement that began with the 1979 Islamic Revolution and the subsequent hostage crisis. Relations experienced a brief thaw with the 2015 nuclear accord, only to collapse after the U.S. withdrawal in 2018. The upcoming talks in Oman are viewed by analysts as a critical test of whether the two adversaries can manage a crisis that has repeatedly brought the region to the brink of wider war.

Voices from the Experts

"Oman's role is indispensable, but the gap between the sides is wider than the Gulf itself," says Dr. Anya Sharma, a senior fellow at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies. "The June strikes set back Iran's program physically, but hardened its political resolve. Trust is the missing ingredient, and it's in desperately short supply."

Marcus Thorne, a former State Department official and author of 'The Persian Puzzle,' offers a cautious perspective: "This is less about a grand bargain and more about crisis management. Both sides are exploring what, if any, temporary understandings are possible to prevent another dangerous escalation, especially with regional actors like Israel on high alert."

A more scathing critique comes from Rebecca Vance, a political commentator with the 'Global Security Review.' "It's theater. Trump's letters, the bombastic threats, then sending diplomats to Oman—it's a disjointed and dangerous game. The administration is legitimizing a regime fresh from massacring its own people, all while Iran spins more centrifuges. This isn't diplomacy; it's desperation coated in photo ops."

General (Ret.) David P. Chen, a security analyst, focuses on the regional implications: "The GCC states are watching nervously. The outcome of these talks will directly impact security from Riyadh to Tel Aviv. A failure could trigger a new, unpredictable phase of proxy conflicts and pre-emptive actions."

The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.