The High Cost of the American Dream: Why a Bestselling Author Says Buying a Home Can Derail Financial Freedom
For generations, the white picket fence has symbolized the ultimate achievement in American life. But with mortgage rates hovering near two-decade highs and home prices stubbornly elevated, the financial calculus of buying a house is being rigorously debated. In a recent episode of the popular ‘The Diary of a CEO’ podcast, bestselling author and financial independence advocate JL Collins delivered a provocative counter-narrative: for many, especially the young, buying a home may be the wrong move.
"If your goal is to become financially independent at a young age, you probably don't want to go buy a house," Collins told host Steven Bartlett. The author of The Simple Path to Wealth argues that the substantial capital required for a down payment and ongoing costs is capital that is not working in the market. "You're putting your capital into that house and now it's not going to be earning anything," he said, highlighting the significant opportunity cost of tying up wealth in a single, illiquid asset.
Collins criticized the industry pressure that pushes buyers to their absolute limit. "People typically buy the most house they can possibly afford. The industry drives them that way," he noted, a practice that leaves little buffer for rising costs or economic shifts.
Data appears to support the financial prudence of his stance. A recent LendingTree study found that owning is now significantly more expensive than renting across major U.S. metros. The report estimated that homeowners with mortgages pay nearly 37% more per month than renters—a median gap of about $550. Collins emphasized that a mortgage payment is just the beginning, with maintenance, property taxes, and insurance creating a persistent financial drag.
Beyond the numbers, Collins pointed to an often-overlooked advantage of renting: mobility. In a dynamic job market, the ability to relocate quickly for a better opportunity without the burden of selling a property is a powerful financial tool. "Getting in and out of an apartment doesn't cost anything," he said. "If you buy a house and then decide you want to go do something else, now you've got to sell it—or rent it. Now you're a landlord, and that's not optimal."
Reader Reactions: A Heated Debate
Michael T., 42, Financial Planner in Austin: "Collins makes a vital point about liquidity and opportunity cost that my younger clients often miss. Homeownership isn't a guaranteed ticket to wealth; it's a leveraged, concentrated bet on one location. Diversification and flexibility are critical in the early wealth-building phase."
Sarah Chen, 29, Software Engineer in Seattle: "This resonates deeply. My partner and I rent a great place well below what a mortgage would cost here. The difference gets auto-invested. We feel financially agile, not trapped. The 'dream' feels more like a script we're told to follow without running the numbers."
David R., 58, Homeowner in Ohio: "This is dangerously shortsighted advice! It ignores 75 years of history where real estate has built middle-class wealth. You're throwing money away on rent. Sure, there are costs, but you're paying down a mortgage and building equity. This 'flexibility' he praises is just a fancy word for having no roots or stake in your community."
Priya L., 35, Recent First-Time Buyer in Atlanta: "It's not so black and white. For us, buying was about stability for our family and locking in housing costs in a growing city. Yes, the roof repair last month hurt, but our payment is fixed while rents in our area keep soaring. It's a personal calculation, not just a spreadsheet one."
The discussion underscores a broader shift in financial planning, where traditional milestones are being reevaluated against metrics of freedom and return on investment. As Collins frames it, the goal isn't necessarily to own a house, but to own your time.
Image: Shutterstock