UK Court Greenlights $900 Million Class Action Against Valve, as Epic Games CEO Slams Steam's "30% Junk Fee"

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.

The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal has cleared the path for a landmark £656 million (approximately $900 million) collective claim against PC gaming giant Valve Corporation. The lawsuit, spearheaded by digital rights advocate Vicki Shotbolt, alleges that Steam's market dominance and policies have forced UK consumers to overpay for games since 2018, while stifling price competition from rival storefronts.

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney, whose company operates the competing Epic Games Store, swiftly endorsed the legal action. In a series of public statements, Sweeney argued that Valve remains an outlier in the industry. "While Apple and Google have been compelled to open their platforms following legal rulings, Valve's Steam stands alone as the last major storefront maintaining a strict payments tie and a 30% fee," Sweeney stated. He likened the practice to "a car dealership demanding a 30% cut of every gas purchase."

The core of the claim hinges on Steam's rules regarding where and how developers can sell their products. The suit contends that publishers are effectively blocked from offering cheaper prices on other platforms for games also available on Steam. Valve has previously countered that its Steam Key system allows for external sales, though the claimants argue the overall structure is designed to maintain Steam's 30% commission on in-game transactions.

Industry analysts note this case is the latest front in a broader battle over platform fees and "walled gardens" in digital marketplaces. The outcome could set a significant precedent for digital distribution models in the UK and potentially influence global regulatory scrutiny.

User Reactions:

Marcus_Dev: "As an indie developer, this case is crucial. That 30% cut is a massive burden on our already thin margins. Other platforms have adapted; it's time for Steam to evolve its model for a more competitive ecosystem."

Lydia_T: "I'm skeptical. Steam provides immense value with its community features, servers, and discovery tools. That infrastructure costs money to maintain. This lawsuit feels like trying to punish a platform for being successful and feature-rich."

Paul_Sharp: "Finally! Valve has operated with impunity for too long, extracting a ridiculous 'tax' on an entire industry. Sweeney is right—it's a junk fee designed to exploit developer lock-in. This lawsuit is long overdue, and I hope it burns their entire greedy model to the ground."

GameHistorian: "The legal details are complex, but the trend is clear: regulators and courts are increasingly scrutinizing the power of major digital gatekeepers. This isn't just about Valve; it's part of a global reassessment of platform power."